☆Maria Tartar's Introduction to Beauty & the Beast☆
Apparently the earliest told version of the 'Beauty & the Beast' tale was called 'Cupid and Psyche' and (not surprisingly) it was told by a "drunken and half-demented" women to a young bride. The heroine of the story, who falls in love thanks to Cupid with 'Eros' (the equivalent of the Beast character) is apparently quite determined to get the monster to love her back - which is an interesting twist considering that usually it is the beast feigning for love and not the pretty young heroine- but I feel as if this is because of Cupid's interjection. The lead sets off on an "epic quest fraught with risks and requiring her to accomplish one impossible task after another", which I think is pretty cool considering that instead of wallowing in her own pain of abandonment by what is deemed to be a 'monster' she goes out and she fights for what she wants, something we don't see in a lot of modern day re-tellings of this story. I think there is a moral here, though Tartar doesn't talk much about it, but the message seems to be that one can still fight for their love - even if their love isn't perhaps accepted by community, or even the other half themselves simply because of their appearances (??)
Eros and Psyche by blackeri
[Number one, Eros doesn't look like a monster at all - he just has wings??? Number two, I guess mythology thinks boys with wings are beasts???]
To jump into something more familiar, Madame de Beamount's telling of 'Beauty & the Beast' is the classic moral fairy tail, shaped specifically to teach young kids (YOUNG GIRLS) a lesson in life. With this it's the basic idea of 'being good' rather then 'doing well' or aka if an ugly, beastly looking man wants to marry you (and he truly loves you and has money) then you should definitely marry him, have some virtue rather then selfish desire for beauty, and just go along with it basically. I like the mention of Beauty's two sisters who are apparently filled with 'envy' and 'malice' and is this perhaps because Beauty married the 'sensible but ugly' option or because they're more interested in someones aesthetic and that resonates them with the idea of 'malice'?
There is also the mention of the 'transformative power of love' since we all know (thanks to Disney) that the Beast actually turns in to a beautiful young prince after being confessed to by Beauty. Basically, this is another ploy to tell girls that looks don't matter, you should value a persons being rather then their looks and they will immediately become more attractive to you no matter what.
Do I agree with Madame de Beaumont on that? No, not really. External appearances, charm, sexual attractiveness - all of that plays a key part in peoples decision to fall in love. I mean sure people marry for money, for safety, for stability- but are those people happy? Are those people really in a 'spellbound' love like Beauty and the Beast are? There isn't anyway to prove it, but I can guarantee that most people agree to the fact that first impressions of others - doesn't matter if they stay strangers or become lovers- are always off of looks and presentation. I give props to the idea that loving someone for who they really are is a good message, but it's also a message that shoves girls into a corner of "Oh, he's a nice guy - why don't you give him a chance?" and that's uncomfortable.
Source (x)
Source (x)
Out of all the re-tellings mentioned in the introduction, I really took a liking to The Grimm's "Frog King" one because of the particular scene Tartar mentions of the heroine "hurling the erotically ambitious frog against the wall". Also the fact that in a Scottish rendition the princess beheads her suitor, which is surprising considering that a lot of the fairy tails (or most writing in general to be honest) doesn't have a women commenting such a violent act, is pretty amusing. I think that out off all stories mentioned, this one has a moral I can actually stick with and it might just be that princess can commit crimes if they're being forced into wedlock with someone as icky as a frog. Of course, this might be me reading into it too much because the Brothers Grimm are known for having much more subtle and acceptable moral lessons to their stories then girls aren't scared too.
Source (x)
[Can we talk about how disgusted she looks by that frog??? It is so beautiful, I love it so much like her expression is just 'Dad-No-I-Am-Not-Marrying-This-Toad-Literally-Ew]
To wrap up my reaction to this introduction, I wanted to mention the idea the Tartar brings up of 'Beauty & the Beast' being a model story rich in the expression of anxiety (specifically for women) about marriage. I agree with her that this was perhaps the idea of past writers, maybe even of the original teller, but now it's become a story that's more interested in the wild and taboo relationship between a young, naive beauty and a big, scary beast. The worst part is, unlike Little Red Riding Hood, this beast is put into a positive light. Now, I'm not trying to say the beast isn't a 'nice guy' but honestly, if you saw a young teenage girl walking down the street, kissing an older looking man with a gruff beard and an ugly expression, would you really think that was natural?
Let's take the modern definition of a 'beastly looking man' and try to pin it up with, for the sake of this, a perk, lolita looking girl - wouldn't you cringe? Be honest. I don't want to delve deeper into this, but I think the relationship between two like this can find root in things nowadays like age-gape relationship, the fetishizing (??) of young girls and older men and vice-versa. Perhaps this is just me being critical and tying it into some of the more popular pop culture - but isn't there this uncomfortable sympathy created for this large, ugly creature who could literally hurt or scare a young girl away?
☆Jeanne-Marie LePrince de Beaumont's Beauty & the Beast☆
It's obvious that this is the story on which the cartoon movie is based off of and before I start making jokes about the talking dinning wear which I think is adorable in the film, I would like to say one thing about this story is that it's a pure and utter fantasy- right down to the core.
Starting from Beauty's request of the rose over her sisters silly wants for jewelry/clothing, down to the fact that it is her tears that bring the Beast into his true form (aka super hot prince) - it's a fairy tale that is supposed to make as stare in wonder at the power of '~*~*~ true love ~*~*~'.
I dislike it, mostly because I feel like there is just so much pity and sympathy being dragged out across the Beast because he's a rich, kind man looking for a girl to adorn in beautiful clothing and to let her live how she pleases as long as she agrees to marry him - even though he's ugly. Usually, I don't like making arguments for the 'strengthening' of male characters, but here the Beast is a total mess. The poor guy (or animal) does everything in his power and we are made to dislike Beauty because she basically 'friendzones' him - a tactic I never like because if someone is giving someone something and they don't give anything in return then obviously they're horrible - which is the case that seems to be building here with Beauty and the Beast.
But then, because Beauty feels bad about breaking the promise and sees the Beast almost dead - she automatically changes her mind and weeps for him to come back.
Beauty is a flimsy character, nothing like the heroines of the other stories we talked about in the introduction, and I wonder if she is supposed to really be a reflection of what a young women should be like? Uninterested in money and wealth at the beginning, befriends the scary looking Beast, and then cries out for him because of pity??? That just doesn't seem like a well rounded character to me at all. And when did Beauty figure out that she even loved the Beast? When he was almost dying? What a great way to confess to someone....
Anyway, THINGS TO DISCUSS IN CLASS:
- when/why does Beauty actually fall for the Beast? Is there even a scene like this?
- Beauty's sisters. Discuss.
- what kind of character is the Beast really? what in our society/who in our society resembles the expectation of a 'Beast' and his reality?